The profile looks much brighter with X-Rite, and completely different from the ones from generated by the either of the Spyders. I just calibrated one of the LG 32UD59-B display using the Colormunki at the default settings for Photo, which are DCI P3, white point D65, luminance 120 cd/m², and tone response curve of 2.20. I have gotten a little into printing, and bought a used ColorMunki Photo, which I received today and am using with the i1 studio software. The difference was noticeable for 2 out of the 3 displays (identical LG32UD59-B) and almost nothing for the third (Asus PB238Q, calibrated to sRGB at factory). There was never much difference between the profiles generated by either the old 3 or newer 5 sensor. For years, I have been using Spyder 3 Pro and Spyder 5 Pro to calibrate my displays.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |